資訊標題：2018池州貴池區學習sat到哪好

池州貴池區sat是池州貴池區sat培訓學校的重點專業，池州市知名的sat培訓機構，教育培訓知名品牌，池州貴池區sat培訓學校師資力量雄厚，全國各大城市均設有分校，學校歡迎你的加入。

池州貴池區sat培訓學校分布池州市貴池區,東至縣,石臺縣,青陽縣等地,是池州市極具影響力的sat培訓機構。

正式考試時，考生看到作文考題那一頁，和本書上面的形式是一模一樣的。

如果沒有形成自己的套路，平常不注意練習，在25分鐘內要想成功組織一篇精彩的文章，恐怕會有很多問題。

這兩段文字幽默，但又決不重合現象，因此，非常具有殺傷力。尤其是第三段結尾的一句“I know that's my father's philosophy when my mother poses such questions.”用了兩個書面語的大詞“philosophy”與“poses questions”，自揭家里的小小尷尬，把閱卷的考官一下子逗笑，高分也就志在必得了。

能在25分鐘內寫那么多東西至少從一個側面證明了自己的寫作能力。

什么東西可以做主語呢？這里使用的是兩個稍微復雜的主語，大家可以學習一下。

is well organized and clearly focused,demonstrating clear coherence and smooth progression of ideas

的名氣，但她創作了大量的兒童故事書，影響了一代又一代的美國人；

這篇要求在25分鐘內完成的命題作文和另外兩個section的語法試題，共同構成了寫作部分的800分。

第一個句子劃線部分是狀語從句，放在句首表原因；

Scoring Guide

值得注意的是，對于SAT的作文題，你是什么樣的觀點不會影響你的最后得分，關鍵是你的觀點是否被有效證明。

從這兩句看來，教育與獨立思考似乎是兩個對立面，無法融合。我們考生應該使用一種什么樣的觀點呢？

我們一般看到的評論是，王后不應該在丈夫尸骨未寒時馬上再嫁，王子為父報仇，雖然最后自己也死了，但勇氣可嘉云云。

在這25分鐘內，考生要審題、確定思路、組織語言來完成一篇獨立的命題作文，可以說，稍微浪費點時間就根本不能有效完成一篇作文。

Champions aren't made in gyms. Champions are made from something they have deep inside them: A desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have last-minute stamina, they have to be a little faster, they have to have the skill and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill.

The debate about quality versus quantity occurs in a variety of settings: Is twenty pages better than ten for a term paper? Is an all-you-can-eat buffet preferable to a gourmet meal? Is a huge lawn more desirable than a small yard? As a society, we tend to value the quantity of productivity to determine how successful a person is. Focusing on the amount produced, however, is based on the false assumption that quantity by itself is an appropriate judge of worth. In fact, the quality of a product is far more important, as we can see by looking at examples from current events and literature.

你的例子舉得好不好，和論點是否密切相關，在很大程度上決定了作文的成敗。

同時，語言非常地道，即使看上去很簡單的句子，反映的也是典型的美式思維。

兩個閱卷者互相之間可能并不認識，也不知道要對同一篇作文打分，更不知道考生的個人資料。

The goal of the Columbia space shuttle mission was to launch safely into space, performing scientific experiments, and to land safely on earth. This was what the crew of and the people at the Houston space centre attempted. This mission was successful until re-entry, when the space shuttle disintegrated without warning. The goal was not achieved; seven astronauts tragically lost their lives. This failure does not mean thatthis tradgety was without value. It forced NASA to re-examine its contingencies. NASA was compelled to look carefully at its organization structure, independent contractors, and engineering practices. Congress demanded accountability, and was forced to re-examine its budget practices concerning space exploration.

池州貴池區sat培訓學校成就你的夢想之旅。學sat就來池州貴池區sat培訓學校

培訓咨詢電話：點擊左側離線寶免費咨詢